z-logo
Premium
Variable‐density one‐shot fourier velocity encoding
Author(s) -
DiCarlo Julie C.,
Hargreaves Brian A.,
Nayak Krishna S.,
Hu Bob S.,
Pauly John M.,
Nishimura Dwight G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.20594
Subject(s) - aliasing , imaging phantom , doppler effect , fourier transform , physics , pulsatile flow , optics , sampling (signal processing) , temporal resolution , flow velocity , resolution (logic) , turbulence , flow (mathematics) , nuclear magnetic resonance , computer science , computer vision , artificial intelligence , filter (signal processing) , mechanics , medicine , quantum mechanics , astronomy , detector , cardiology
In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of k z ‐ k v space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here