z-logo
Premium
In vivo EPR spectroscopic imaging for a liposomal drug delivery system
Author(s) -
Matsumoto Kenichiro,
Yahiro Tomoaki,
Yamada Kenichi,
Utsumi Hideo
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.20460
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , liposome , in vivo , nuclear magnetic resonance , chemistry , electron paramagnetic resonance , biomedical engineering , signal (programming language) , materials science , nuclear medicine , physics , medicine , biology , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , computer science , programming language
We used the membrane‐impermeable nitroxyl radical 4‐trimethylammonium‐2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine‐1‐oxyliodide (CAT‐1) as a model drug encapsulated in liposomes in order to separately map the 2D distribution of both liposomal‐encapsulated CAT‐1 and free CAT‐1. Phantoms were prepared with a CAT‐1 solution and a liposomal CAT‐1 suspension. Spectral‐spatial images were obtained along several polar‐arranged spatial axes through the phantom. The 1D spatial distributions (projections) of each signal component, reflecting the concentration of CAT‐1, were then extracted from the spectral‐spatial images. 2D EPR images of liposomal‐encapsulated CAT‐1 and free CAT‐1 were separately reconstructed from the resulting projection data sets. 2D mapping of each component exhibited good agreement with respect to the phantom. Separate maps were generated from separate injections of free CAT‐1 and liposomal CAT‐1 injected into the femoral muscle of a living mouse. The EPR signal of the free CAT‐1 gradually decreased during data acquisition. Because of this decay, we calibrated the image intensity by extrapolating the signal intensity to that detected at the beginning of data sampling. Both the position and size of the individual images were in very good agreement with those of the mouse thigh obtained by MRI. Magn Reson Med 53:1158–1165, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here