z-logo
Premium
T 2 Accuracy on a whole‐body imager
Author(s) -
Foltz Warren D.,
Stainsby Jeffery A.,
Wright Graham A.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.1910380512
Subject(s) - signal (programming language) , physics , pulse (music) , nuclear magnetic resonance , time constant , simple (philosophy) , imaging phantom , optics , computational physics , materials science , computer science , electrical engineering , philosophy , epistemology , detector , programming language , engineering
MR oximetry requires a T 2 measurement that is accurate within 5% in vivo. Simple methods are susceptible to signal loss and tend to underestimate T 2 . Current methods utilize RF pulses or RF cycling patterns that prevent signal loss at each data acquisition. However, using these methods with imperfect pulses, T 2 tends to be overestimated due to temporary storage of the magnetization along the longitudinal axis where it decays more slowly with a time constant T 1 T 2 . To reduce the T 1 dependence while preventing signal loss, we utilize simple 90 x 180 y 90 x composite pulses and good RF cycling patterns. These trains are critical for T 2 accuracy over typical ranges of RF and static field inhomogeneities and refocusing intervals. T 1 signal decay during each 90 x 180 y 90 x pulse must be accounted for to yield accuracy within 5% when the pulse‐width is 10% or more of the refocusing interval. A simple correction scheme compensates for this T 1 ‐related error effectively.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom