Premium
Motion Artifacts in fMRI: Comparison of 2DFT with PR and Spiral Scan Methods
Author(s) -
Glover Gary H.,
Lee Adrian T.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.1910330507
Subject(s) - spiral (railway) , artifact (error) , intensity (physics) , pulsatile flow , artificial intelligence , contrast (vision) , projection (relational algebra) , physics , computer science , computer vision , motion (physics) , nuclear magnetic resonance , mathematics , optics , mathematical analysis , algorithm , medicine , cardiology
Activation signals based on BOLD contrast changes consequent to neuronal stimulation typically produce cortical intensity differences of < 10% at 1.5T. Hemodynamically driven pulsation of the brain can cause highly pulsatile phase shifts, which in turn result in motion artifacts whose intensity is larger than the activation signals in 2DFT scan methods. This paper presents a theoretical and experimental comparison of the magnitude of such artifacts for 2DFT and two other methods using non‐Cartesian k ‐space trajectories. It is shown that artifacts increase with TR for 2DFT methods, and that projection reconstruction (PR) and spiral methods have significantly reduced artifact intensities, because these trajectories collect low spatial frequencies with every view. The spiral technique is found to be superior in terms of efficiency and motion insensitivity.