z-logo
Premium
Scalar coupling and zero‐quantum coherence relaxation in STEAM: Implications for spectral editing of lactate
Author(s) -
Kingsley Peter B.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.1910310311
Subject(s) - coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) , amplitude , physics , scalar (mathematics) , chemistry , pulse sequence , coherence time , quantum , nuclear magnetic resonance , relaxation (psychology) , atomic physics , quantum mechanics , analytical chemistry (journal) , mathematics , psychology , social psychology , geometry , chromatography
Accurate values were obtained for the lactate zero‐quantum coherence frequency, ω ZQ = ω i ‐ω s = CH 3 –CH chemical shift difference, and scalar coupling constant, J, by using the methyl signal's amplitude modulation during the TM period of a STEAM sequence, 90°– TE /2–90°–TM–90°– TE /2‐ Acquire. Although most previous work has used J = 7.35 Hz, or 1/ J = 136 ms, the actual value is J = 6.93 ± 0.05 Hz or 1/ J = 144.3 ± 1 ms. In addition, the CH 3 –CH chemical shift difference = 2.7956 ± 0.0005 ppm, and the relaxation time for zero‐quantum coherence, T ZQ , was much shorter than either T 2 or T 1 for the methyl resonance. A small component of the signal with TE = 144 ms, which was not modulated at the zero‐quantum coherence frequency or by scalar coupling, was assigned to longitudinal two‐spin order magnetization (I z S z ) created by imperfect radio frequency pulse profiles. This information will allow improved editing of the lactate signal and more accurate quantitation of lactate concentrations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here