Premium
Wavelet‐encoded MR imaging
Author(s) -
Weaver John B.,
Xu Yansun,
Healy Dennis M.,
Driscoll James R.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.1910240209
Subject(s) - wavelet , encoding (memory) , wavelet packet decomposition , wavelet transform , computer science , translation (biology) , projection (relational algebra) , artificial intelligence , nuclear magnetic resonance , mathematics , physics , algorithm , chemistry , biochemistry , messenger rna , gene
Wavelet encoding is presented and compared to phase encoding. In wavelet encoding a distribution of spins is excited by a slice selective RF pulse; for each repetition time the distribution excited has the profile of a wavelet at different scale and translation. The spin density can be reconstructed with an inverse wavelet transform. Wavelet encoding has three advantages over phase encoding: (1) there is no Gibblquot's ringing from partial volume effects, (2) the effective repetition time can be 36 times the repetition time for a 256 × 256 image, and (3) motion artifacts are local and dramatically reduced. Using wavelet encoding, a 256 × 256 T 2 ‐weighted projection image can be acquired in 33s. © 1992 Academic Press, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom