Premium
A comparison of some gradient‐encoded volume‐selection techniques for in vivo NMR spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Galloway Graham J.,
Brereton Ian M.,
Brooks William M.,
Field James,
Irving Michael,
Baddeley Hiram,
Doddrell David M.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.1910040412
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , nuclear magnetic resonance , in vivo , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , volume (thermodynamics) , spectroscopy , materials science , chemistry , biomedical engineering , physics , optics , biology , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , quantum mechanics
Four of the techniques proposed for in vivo volume‐selected NMR spectroscopy have been compared using a simple phantom with a large background water signal which was outside the region of interest. The methods VSE, SPACE, SPARS, and DIGGER all use pulsed field gradients for spatial encoding and were tested with a symmetric and an asymmetric phantom. SPACE was used to obtain volume‐selected 1 H NMR spectra of a human leg, demonstrating excellent discrimination between bone marrow and muscle. © 1987 Academic Press, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom