Premium
Optimization of signal‐to‐noise ratio in calculated T 1 images derived from two spin‐echo images
Author(s) -
Prato F. S.,
Drost D. J.,
Keys T.,
Laxon P.,
Comissiong B.,
Sestini E.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.1910030109
Subject(s) - spin echo , physics , nuclear magnetic resonance , noise (video) , echo time , signal (programming language) , echo (communications protocol) , spin (aerodynamics) , image (mathematics) , magnetic resonance imaging , computer science , artificial intelligence , medicine , computer network , radiology , programming language , thermodynamics
A simplified model relating signal intensity in an MR image to spin‐lattice relaxation time ( T 1 ), repetition time ( T R ), number of signal averages and the average tip angle ( α ) of the protons within the slice has been developed. This model has been used to select the optimal repetition times of two spin‐echo images for a fixed total imaging time to maximize signal to noise in calculated T 1 images. Theoretical predictions of T 1 are virtually identical to spectroscopically measured values, and the relative noise (δ T 1 ) in T 1 images calculated from two measured spin‐echo images is in good agreement with the theoretically predicted values of δ T 1 / T 1 . This model predicts that: (a) for a T 1 of approximately 500 ms, the least T 1 image noise is obtained with one of the spin‐echo images collected with a T R of 400–500 ms. The longer the T R of the other spin‐echo image, the lower the T 1 image noise, but past a T R of approximately 1400 ms, T 1 image signal/noise is optimized for the same total imaging time by increasing the number of averages in the shorter T R spin‐echo image rather than increasing the T R of the second spin‐echo image. (b) The error is reduced and the optimum T R1 is reduced as α is increased from 63 to 90°. (c) For a range of T 1 , optimal selection of T R1 and T R2 based on an intermediate value of T 1 , results in relatively little increase over optimal values in δ T 1 / T 1 for the entire T 1 range. © 1986 Academic Press, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom