Premium
In vitro and in vivo derived porcine embryos possess similar, but not identical, patterns of Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2 mRNA expression during cleavage development
Author(s) -
Magnani Luca,
Cabot Ryan A.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
molecular reproduction and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.745
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1098-2795
pISSN - 1040-452X
DOI - 10.1002/mrd.20915
Subject(s) - homeobox protein nanog , sox2 , biology , blastocyst , embryo , nanog homeobox protein , microbiology and biotechnology , rex1 , in vitro , embryogenesis , in vivo , embryonic stem cell , andrology , genetics , gene , induced pluripotent stem cell , medicine
In vitro culture conditions stress the cleavage stage mammalian embryo and can contribute to reduced developmental potential of cultured embryos. One process that may be altered during embryo culture is the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. Pluripotency is largely controlled by three genes: Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2. The objective of this study was to determine the expression pattern of Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2 in cleavage stage porcine embryos obtained in vivo or by in vitro fertilization and parthenogenetic activation. We used quantitative, real time PCR to assess the relative amount of each transcript in cleavage stage embryos. We found that Oct4 was transiently activated at the 2‐cell stage ( P ‐value <0.05) while Nanog and Sox2 were activated at the 4‐cell stage ( P ‐value <0.05) in in vitro embryos. Embryos derived in vivo showed a similar but not identical pattern of expression of Nanog mRNA been in highest abundance both at the 4 cell and the blastocyst stage. The activation observed at the 4‐cell stage for Nanog and Sox2 was shown to be RNA polymerase II dependent ( P ‐value <0.05). This study showed that Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2 possess similar, but not identical, patterns of expression between in vitro and in vivo derived porcine embryos. The difference between the amount of transcripts may reflect the reduced developmental potential observed in in vitro cultured embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75: 1726–1735, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.