Premium
Dynamics and organization of MAP kinase signal pathways
Author(s) -
Errede Beverly,
Cade Rebecca M.,
Yashar Beverly M.,
Kamada Yoshiaki,
Levin David E.,
Irie Kenji,
Matsumoto Kunihiro
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
molecular reproduction and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.745
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1098-2795
pISSN - 1040-452X
DOI - 10.1002/mrd.1080420416
Subject(s) - mapk/erk pathway , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , map kinase kinase kinase , mitogen activated protein kinase , signal transduction , protein kinase a , kinase
In the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae , four separate but structurally related mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation pathways are known. The best understood of these regulates mating. Pheromone binding to receptor informs cells of the proximity of a mating partner and induces differentiation to a mating competent state. The MARK activation cascade mediating this signal is made up of Ste 11 (a MEK kinase [MEKK]), Ste7 (a MAPK/ERK kinase [MEK]), and the redundant MAPK‐related Fus3 and Kss1 enzymes. Another MAPK activation pathway is important for cell integrity and regulates cell wall construction. This cascade consists of Bck1 (a MEKK), the redundant Mkk1 and Mkk2 enzymes (MEKs), and Mpk1 (a MAPK). We exploited these two pathways to learn about the coordination and signal transmission fidelity of MAPK activation cascades. Two lines of evidence suggest that the activities of the mating and cell integrity pathways are coordinated during mating differentiation. First, cells deficient in Mpk1 are susceptible to lysis when they make a mating projection in response to pheromone. Second, Mpk1 activation during pheromone induction coincides with projection formation. The mechanism underlying this coordination is still unknown to us. Our working model is that projection formation generates a mobile second messenger for activation of the cell integrity pathway. Analysis of a STE7 mutation gave us some unanticipated but important insights into parameters important for fidelity of signal transmission. The Ste7 variant has a serine to proline substitution at position 368. Ste7‐P 368 has higher basal activity than the wild‐type enzyme but still requires Ste 11 for its function. Additionally, the proline substitution enables the variant to transmit the signal from mammalian Raf expressed in yeast. This novel activity suggests that Ste7‐P 368 is inherently more permissive than Ste7 in its interactions with MEKKs. Yet, Ste7‐P 368 cross function in the cell integrity pathway occurs only when it is highly overproduced or when Ste5 is missing. This behavior suggests that Ste5, which has been proposed to be a tether for the kinases in the mating pathway, contributes to Ste7 specificity and fidelity of signal transmission. © 1995 wiley‐Liss, Inc.