Premium
Detection of DNA damage in bovine metaphase II oocytes resulting from cryopreservation
Author(s) -
Men H.,
Monson R.L.,
Parrish J.J.,
Rutledge J.J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
molecular reproduction and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.745
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1098-2795
pISSN - 1040-452X
DOI - 10.1002/mrd.10249
Subject(s) - cryopreservation , oocyte , vitrification , biology , oocyte cryopreservation , dna damage , andrology , comet assay , dna , microbiology and biotechnology , embryo , fertility preservation , genetics , medicine , fertility , population , demography , sociology
Developmental competence of mammalian oocytes is compromised by currently available oocyte cryopreservation protocols. Experiments were designed to examine the effect of three cryopreservation protocols on the integrity of bovine oocyte DNA. In vitro matured bovine oocytes were cryopreserved either by slow cooling, vitrification in 0.25 ml straws, or in open pulled straws. After thawing/warming, recovered oocytes were immediately subjected to morphological evaluation. Morphologically intact oocytes underwent comet assay to detect cryoinjury at DNA level. All cryopreservation protocols resulted in significant morphological damage as well as DNA damage compared to unfrozen control. Among the morphologically intact oocytes, there was no difference among protocols in the number of oocytes displaying DNA damage. However, oocytes that had been cryopreserved by slow cooling or by vitrification in open pulled straws exhibited more damage than those vitrified in 0.25 ml straws in the extent of DNA damage. If we combine the number of oocytes with morphological damage and oocytes with DNA damage, oocytes cooled by slow cooling resulted in the most damage. This experiment demonstrated that oocyte DNA is a target of cryoinjury and different protocols result in different degrees of damage. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 64: 245–250, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.