z-logo
Premium
Configuration and E / Z interconversion mechanism of O ( S )‐allyl‐ S ( O )‐methyl‐ N ‐(acridin‐9‐yl) iminothiocarbonate
Author(s) -
Klika Karel D.,
Imrich Ján,
Danihel Ivan,
Böhm Stanislav,
Kristian Pavol,
Hamul'aková Slávka,
Pihlaja Kalevi,
Koch Andreas,
Kleinpeter Erich
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.483
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1097-458X
pISSN - 0749-1581
DOI - 10.1002/mrc.1564
Subject(s) - chemistry , isomerization , quantum chemical , stereochemistry , inversion (geology) , computational chemistry , chemical shift , walden inversion , transition state , molecule , organic chemistry , structural basin , biology , catalysis , paleontology
The configuration and dynamic behavior of O ‐allyl‐ S ‐methyl‐ N ‐(acridin‐9‐yl)iminothiocarbonate ( 1 ) and its S ‐allyl‐ O ‐methyl regioisomer ( 2 ) were studied using quantum chemical calculations and by applying a novel graphical method to scatter maps obtained from MD simulations for evaluation of an NOE‐weighted internuclear distance ( r NOE ). Energy calculations indicated that the Z configuration was predominant for each compound and, further, this was supported both by the calculated chemical shifts and the r NOE . Both N‐inversion‐ and rotation‐type transition‐state structures were also calculated for the E / Z isomerization process, the results indicating that the preferred interconversion mechanism for 1 is N‐inversion, but contrastingly, interconversion via rotation is equally as probable as N‐inversion for 2 . This supports the notion that one or the other or both pathways can be active and each system needs to be assessed on a case‐by‐case basis. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom