z-logo
Premium
Proton n.m.r. spin‐tickling studies of 13 C‐labeled compounds. The correlation of J (C,H) and J (H,H)
Author(s) -
Marshall James L.,
Seiwell Ruth
Publication year - 1976
Publication title -
organic magnetic resonance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.483
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1097-458X
pISSN - 0030-4921
DOI - 10.1002/mrc.1270080806
Subject(s) - proton , coupling constant , chemistry , stereochemistry , spin (aerodynamics) , medicinal chemistry , crystallography , physics , thermodynamics , nuclear physics , particle physics
A tabulation has been compiled for twenty 13 CH coupling constants of various carboxylic acids and includes 2 J (C,H), 3 J (C,H) and 4 J (C,H) values of olefins (both cis and trans ); 3 J (C,H), 4 J (C,H) and 5 J (C,H) values of aromatics; 3 J (C,H) and 4 J (C,H) values of acetylenes; and 2 J (C,H) and 3 J (C,H) values of rigid aliphatics. This tabulation has been completed in the present study by the spin‐tickling proton n.m.r. study of 13 C‐ carboxyl ‐ endo ‐1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexachloronorbornene‐5‐carboxylic acid, which has established that the 2 J (C,H) value is negative and the 3 J (C,H) values (both cis and trans ) are positive in this system. A plot of these twenty J (C,H) values vs the corresponding J (H,H) values of geometrically equivalent model systems (where there is a proton in place of a carboxyl group) gives a correlation coefficient of 0·975 (with a slope of 0·62), indicating that carbon–proton and proton–proton couplings operate by similar mechanisms throughout this broad series of structural types.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here