z-logo
Premium
Monte Carlo simulation of conical collimators for stereotactic radiosurgery with a 6 MV flattening‐filter‐free photon beam
Author(s) -
HermidaLópez Marcelino,
SánchezArtuñedo David,
Rodríguez Miguel,
Brualla Lorenzo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.14837
Subject(s) - truebeam , linear particle accelerator , monte carlo method , radiosurgery , imaging phantom , dosimetry , physics , optics , nuclear medicine , detector , medical physics , stereotactic radiotherapy , beam (structure) , radiation therapy , medicine , mathematics , radiology , statistics
Purpose Conical collimators, or cones, are tertiary collimators that attach to a radiotherapy linac and are suited for the stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of small brain lesions. The small diameter of the most used cones makes difficult the acquisition of the dosimetry data needed for the commissioning of treatment planning systems. Although many publications report dosimetric data of conical collimators for stereotactic radiosurgery, most of the works use different setups, which complicates comparisons. In other cases, the cone output factors reported do not take into account the effect of the small cone diameter on the detector response. Finally, few data exist on the dosimetry of cones with flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams from modern linac models. This work aims at obtaining a dosimetric characterization of the conical collimators manufactured by Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) in a 6 MV FFF beam from a TrueBeam STx linac (Varian Medical Systems). Methods Percentage depth dose curves, lateral dose profiles and cone output factors were obtained using Monte Carlo simulations for the cones with diameters of 4, 5, 6, 7.5, 8, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 25, and 30 mm. The simulation of the linac head was carried out with the PRIMO Monte Carlo software, and the simulations of the cones and the water phantom were run with the general‐purpose Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. The Monte Carlo model was validated by comparing the simulation results with measurements performed for the cones of 4, 5, and 7.5 mm of diameter using a stereotactic field diode, a microDiamond detector and EBT3 radiochromic film. In addition, for those cones, simulations and measurements were done for comparison purposes, by reproducing the experimental setups from the available publications. Results The experimental data acquired for the cones of 4, 5, and 7.5 mm validated the developed Monte Carlo model. The simulations accurately reproduced the experimental depths of maximum dose and the dose ratio at 20‐ and 10‐cm depth (PDD 20/10 ). A good agreement was obtained between simulated and experimental lateral dose profiles: The differences in the full‐width at half‐maximum were smaller than 0.2 mm, and the differences in the penumbra 80%‐20% were smaller than 0.25 mm. The difference between the simulated and the average of the experimental output factors for the cones of 4, 5, and 7.5 mm of diameter was 0.0%, 0.0%, and 3.0%, respectively, well within the statistical uncertainty of the simulations (4.4% with coverage factor k  = 2). It was also found that the simulated cone output factors agreed within 2% with the average of output factors reported in the literature for a variety of setup conditions, detectors, beam qualities, and cone manufacturers. Conclusion A Monte Carlo model of cones for stereotactic radiosurgery has been developed and validated. The cone dosimetry dataset obtained in this work, consisting of percentage depth doses, lateral dose profiles and output factors, is useful to benchmark data acquired for the commissioning of cone‐based radiosurgery treatment planning systems.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here