Premium
NEMA NU‐4 2008 performance evaluation of Xtrim‐PET: A prototype SiPM‐based preclinical scanner
Author(s) -
Amirrashedi Mahsa,
Sarkar Saeed,
Ghafarian Pardis,
Hashemi Shahraki Reza,
Geramifar Parham,
Zaidi Habib,
Ay Mohammad Reza
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.13785
Subject(s) - scanner , silicon photomultiplier , imaging phantom , image quality , image resolution , nuclear medicine , materials science , physics , optics , biomedical engineering , detector , computer science , medicine , scintillator , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics)
Purpose Xtrim‐PET is a newly designed Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs)‐based prototype PET scanner dedicated for small laboratory animal imaging. We present the performance evaluation of the Xtrim‐PET scanner following NEMA NU‐4 2008 standards to help optimizing scanning protocols which can be achieved through standard and reliable system performance characterization. Methods The performance assessment was conducted according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU‐4 2008 standards in terms of spatial resolution, sensitivity, counting rate performance, scatter fraction and image quality. The in vivo imaging capability of the scanner is also showcased through scanning a normal mouse injected with 18 F‐FDG. Furthermore, the performance characteristics of the developed scanner are compared with commercially available systems and current prototypes. Results The volumetric spatial resolution at 5 mm radial offset from the central axis of the scanner is 6.81 µl, whereas a peak absolute sensitivity of 2.99% was achieved using a 250–650 keV energy window and a 10 ns timing window. The peak noise‐equivalent count rate (NECR) using a mouse‐like phantom is 113.18 kcps at 0.34 KBq/cc with 12.5% scatter fraction, whereas the NECR peaked at 82.76 kcps for an activity concentration level of 0.048 KBq/cc with a scatter fraction of 25.8% for rat‐like phantom. An excellent uniformity (3.8%) was obtained using NEMA image quality phantom. Recovery coefficients of 90%, 86%, 68%, 40% and 12% were calculated for rod diameters of 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 mm, respectively. Spill‐over ratios for air‐filled and water‐filled chambers were 35% and 25% without applying any correction for attenuation and Compton scattering effects. Conclusion Our findings revealed that beyond compactness, lightweight, easy installation and good energy resolution, the Xtrim‐PET prototype presents a reasonable performance making it suitable for preclinical molecular imaging‐based research.