Premium
Technical Note: Experimental characterization of the dose deposition in parallel MRI‐linacs at various magnetic field strengths
Author(s) -
Begg Jarrad,
Alnaghy Sarah J.,
Causer Trent,
Alharthi Thahabah,
George Armia,
Glaubes Laura,
Dong Bin,
Goozee Gary,
Keall Paul,
Jelen Urszula,
Liney Gary,
Holloway Lois
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.13767
Subject(s) - isocenter , dosimetry , materials science , magnet , magnetic field , linear particle accelerator , beam (structure) , laser beam quality , collimator , deposition (geology) , ion beam , optics , ionization chamber , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , nuclear medicine , ion , imaging phantom , medicine , paleontology , laser , quantum mechanics , sediment , laser beams , biology , ionization
Purpose Dose deposition measurements for parallel MRI‐linacs have previously only shown comparisons between 0 T and a single available magnetic field. The Australian MRI‐Linac consists of a magnet coupled with a dual energy linear accelerator and a 120 leaf Multi‐Leaf Collimator with the radiation beam parallel to the magnetic field. Two different magnets, with field strengths of 1 and 1.5 T, were used during prototyping. This work aims to characterize the impact of the magnetic field at 1 and 1.5 T on dose deposition, possible by comparing dosimetry measured at both magnetic field strengths to measurements without the magnetic field. Methods Dose deposition measurements focused on a comparison of beam quality (TPR 20/10 ), PDD, profiles at various depths, surface doses, and field size output factors. Measurements were acquired at 0, 1, and 1.5 T. Beam quality was measured using an ion chamber in solid water at isocenter with appropriate TPR 20/10 buildup. PDDs and profiles were acquired via EBT3 film placed in solid water either parallel or perpendicular to the radiation beam. Films at surface were used to determine surface dose. Output factors were measured in solid water using an ion chamber at isocenter with 10 cm solid water buildup. Results Beam quality was within ±0.5% of the 0 T value for the 1 and 1.5 T magnetic field strengths. PDDs and profiles showed agreement for the three magnetic field strengths at depths beyond 20 mm. Deposited dose increased at shallower depths due to electron focusing. Output factors showed agreement within 1%. Conclusion Dose deposition at depth for a parallel MRI‐linac was not significantly impacted by either a 1 or 1.5 T magnetic field. PDDs and profiles at shallow depths and surface dose measurements showed significant differences between 0, 1, and 1.5 T due to electron focusing.