Premium
Technical Note: Evaluation of kV CBCT enhancement using a liver‐specific contrast agent for stereotactic body radiation therapy image guidance
Author(s) -
Lincoln John D.,
Parsons David,
Clarke Sharon E.,
Cwajna Slawa,
Robar James L.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.13384
Subject(s) - cone beam computed tomography , imaging phantom , contrast to noise ratio , nuclear medicine , image quality , medicine , medical imaging , image guided radiation therapy , biomedical engineering , computed tomography , materials science , radiology , computer science , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence
Purpose To evaluate possible use for cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance, this phantom study evaluated the contrast enhancement provided by Gadoxetate Disodium (Primovist ® CAN/EU, or Eovist ® USA, Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany), a contrast agent that is taken up selectively by liver cells and is retained for up to an hour. Image quality from CBCT was benchmarked against helical fan‐beam computed tomography for two phantom geometries. Methods and Materials Concentrations were diluted to 0.0125–0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight (mmol/kg) corresponding to expected physiological concentrations in the liver. Kilovoltage CBCT imaging parameters of x‐ray tube potential, current, and filtration were investigated using clinically available options on a TrueBeam STx linear accelerator CBCT platform. Two phantoms were created, a cylindrical idealized imaging geometry and an ellipsoidal more realistic abdominal geometry. All parameters were optimized according to the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) image quality metric, as a function of concentration, following the Rose criterion for CNR. Results Acceptable CNR was defined as greater than or equal to three, in accordance with the Rose criterion for CNR. These were found in a range of expected liver concentrations of 0.025–0.1 mmol/kg for a tube potential of 100 kVp, half‐fan bowtie filtration and tube currents giving exposures between 2025 and 5085 mAs. Linear correlations were found for all CNR as a function of concentration, in agreement with the literature. Conclusion Based on this phantom study, with appropriate selection of imaging protocol, Gadoxetate Disodium may provide useful liver CBCT enhancement at physiologically achievable liver concentrations.