Premium
Image quality and dose characteristics for an O‐arm intraoperative imaging system with model‐based image reconstruction
Author(s) -
Uneri A.,
Zhang X.,
Yi T.,
Stayman J. W.,
Helm P. A.,
Theodore N.,
Siewerdsen J. H.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.13167
Subject(s) - image quality , iterative reconstruction , image resolution , nuclear medicine , calibration , image noise , point spread function , medical imaging , computer science , mathematics , artificial intelligence , medicine , image (mathematics) , statistics
Purpose To assess the imaging performance and radiation dose characteristics of the O‐arm CBCT imaging system (Medtronic Inc., Littleton MA) and demonstrate the potential for improved image quality and reduced dose via model‐based image reconstruction (MBIR). Methods Two main studies were performed to investigate previously unreported characteristics of the O‐arm system. First is an investigation of dose and 3D image quality achieved with filtered back‐projection (FBP) — including enhancements in geometric calibration, handling of lateral truncation and detector saturation, and incorporation of an isotropic apodization filter. Second is implementation of an MBIR algorithm based on Huber‐penalized likelihood estimation (PLH) and investigation of image quality improvement at reduced dose. Each study involved measurements in quantitative phantoms as a basis for analysis of contrast‐to‐noise ratio and spatial resolution as well as imaging of a human cadaver to test the findings under realistic imaging conditions. Results View‐dependent calibration of system geometry improved the accuracy of reconstruction as quantified by the full‐width at half maximum of the point‐spread function — from 0.80 to 0.65 mm — and yielded subtle but perceptible improvement in high‐contrast detail of bone (e.g., temporal bone). Standard technique protocols for the head and body imparted absorbed dose of 16 and 18 mGy, respectively. For low‐to‐medium contrast (<100 HU) imaging at fixed spatial resolution (1.3 mm edge‐spread function) and fixed dose (6.7 mGy), PLH improved CNR over FBP by +48% in the head and +35% in the body. Evaluation at different dose levels demonstrated 30% increase in CNR at 62% of the dose in the head and 90% increase in CNR at 50% dose in the body. Conclusions A variety of improvements in FBP implementation (geometric calibration, truncation and saturation effects, and isotropic apodization) offer the potential for improved image quality and reduced radiation dose on the O‐arm system. Further gains are possible with MBIR, including improved soft‐tissue visualization, low‐dose imaging protocols, and extension to methods that naturally incorporate prior information of patient anatomy and/or surgical instrumentation.