Premium
Accuracy of electron density, effective atomic number, and iodine concentration determination with a dual‐layer dual‐energy computed tomography system
Author(s) -
Hua Chiaho,
Shapira Nadav,
Merchant Thomas E.,
Klahr Paul,
Yagil Yoad
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.12903
Subject(s) - effective atomic number , imaging phantom , collimated light , dual layer , nuclear medicine , materials science , atomic number , digital enhanced cordless telecommunications , half value layer , attenuation , biomedical engineering , radiation , medicine , physics , optics , layer (electronics) , atomic physics , laser , composite material , radiation shielding , telecommunications , computer science , wireless
Purpose This study aimed to quantitate the accuracy of the determination of electron density ( ED ), effective atomic number (Z eff ), and iodine concentration, directed for more accurate radiation therapy planning, with a new dual‐layer dual‐energy computed tomography ( DL ‐ DECT ) system. The dependence of the accuracy of these values on the scan and reconstruction parameters, as well as on the phantom size, was also examined. Methods Measurements were performed on a commercial DECT system with a DL detector ( IQ on Spectral CT , Philips Healthcare), using phantoms with various tissue‐equivalent inserts as well as iodine and calcium inserts of different concentrations. The expected values of ED and Z eff for the insert materials were derived from the chemical compositions provided by the vendors. The nominal scan condition for the accuracy measurements was 120 kV p, 20 mG y CTDI vol, 0.812 pitch, 16 × 0.625 mm collimation, and 0.33‐second gantry rotation. Results The median deviation of ED ranged from −0.1% to 1.1% for all Gammex tissue inserts. The median deviation of Z eff ranged from −2.3% to 1.7% for soft tissue and bone inserts and was ≤7% for lung inserts. The absolute deviations for ED and Z eff in lung inserts were within 1% of the ED of water and 1 a.u., respectively. For two different phantom sizes, the ED values agreed to within 0.7% and the Z eff values agreed to within 2%, except for the lung inserts. When the scan parameters were changed from 120 kV p/20 mG y to 140 kV p/30 mG y, the ED differed within [−0.51%, 0.65%] and the Z eff differed within [−1.1%, 0.23%] for all materials except lungs, in which Z eff increased by 2.4%. The accuracy of ED and Z eff measurement at 120 kV p was no worse than that at 140 kV p. For iodine quantitation, the median absolute deviations from the nominal values were up to 0.3 mg/ mL for iodine concentrations of 2–20 mg/ mL , with an overall median deviation of −0.1 mg/ mL . Iodine and calcium were well separated on the ED ‐Z eff scatter plot, even at the lowest concentrations (2 mg/ mL for iodine and 50 mg/ mL for calcium). Conclusions The accuracy of ED measurement, Z eff determination, and iodine quantitation derived from DL ‐ DECT was demonstrated with phantom measurements. The accuracies were not sensitive to scan and reconstruction parameters, namely tube potential, dose, rotation time, and spectral reconstruction level, especially in the case of electron density.