Premium
Feasibility study of range‐based registration using daily cone beam CT for intensity‐modulated proton therapy
Author(s) -
Yao Weiguang,
Krasin Matthew J.,
Farr Jonathan B.,
Merchant Thomas E.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.12760
Subject(s) - proton therapy , cone beam computed tomography , range (aeronautics) , standard deviation , nuclear medicine , voxel , image registration , pencil beam scanning , particle therapy , beam (structure) , materials science , medicine , optics , computed tomography , radiology , mathematics , physics , computer science , statistics , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , composite material
Purpose Proton dose coverage is sensitive to proton beam range. The current practice of CT number–based registration for patient positioning focuses on matching the target and is not sufficient for proton therapy because the proton range depends on the medium traversed by the beam. Patient body deformations and anatomical changes result in range deviation in the target. We propose proton range–based registration to minimize the range deviation. Methods The range was calculated from cone beam–computed tomography (CBCT) of the patient on couch, and the range deviation was the difference of the calculated range from that on the initial (day 1) CBCT. In the investigated prostate cases in which the main cause of range deviation was the rotation of femur bones, and in the investigated abdomen cases in which the main cause of range deviation was body growth and anatomic change, our range‐based registration was used to obtain the optimal beam angle by minimizing the range deviation. The new angle was limited to be ±5° from that planned to prevent potentially increased dose to the organs at risk. To demonstrate the benefit of range‐based registration, we investigated the range at the voxels on the surface of the target volume. The calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was investigated by using solid water phantoms with different thicknesses. Range‐based registration using both CBCTs and CTs was performed in cases of two patients with pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma and one patient with upper abdominal tumor. The range was represented by the water‐equivalent thickness to shorten the computation for online application purposes. Results In the phantom study, the calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was within 2 mm for a 1‐cm thickness change (the mean range deviation was 0.8 mm). In the CT study of the prostate cases, the range deviation (mean ± root‐mean‐square deviation) on the contour in each slice was efficiently reduced from 3.6 ± 2.8 mm to 2.1 ± 1.4 mm, with most slices being within 3 mm; in the CT study of the abdomen cases, the range deviation of the whole set was reduced from 4.4 ± 1.9 mm to 3.5 ± 2.1 mm. Both the mean and root‐mean‐square deviation of the range deviation on each treatment day were decreased. The dose coverage on the target was improved and the dose on the OARs was only slightly changed. Conclusion Range‐based registration can efficiently mitigate range deviation due to patient positioning and anatomical changes. It can shorten patient positioning time and reduce the patient's dose from CBCT.