z-logo
Premium
Correcting TG 119 confidence limits
Author(s) -
Kearney Vasant,
Solberg Timothy,
Jensen Shane,
Cheung Joey,
Chuang Cynthia,
Valdes Gilmer
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.12759
Subject(s) - cls upper limits , confidence interval , gaussian , estimator , outlier , gamma distribution , statistics , mathematics , mean squared error , medicine , physics , quantum mechanics , optometry
Purpose Task Group 119 ( TG ‐119) has been adopted for evaluating the adequacy of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy ( IMRT ) commissioning and for establishing patient‐specific IMRT quality assurance ( QA ) passing criteria in clinical practice. TG ‐119 establishes 95% confidence limits ( CL s), which help clinics identify systematic IMRT QA errors and identify outliers. In TG ‐119, the 95% CL s are established by fitting the Gamma Γ analysis passing rate results to an assumed distribution, then calculating the limit in which 95% of the data fall. CL s for a given dataset will depend greatly on the type of distribution used, and those determined by following the TG ‐119 guidelines are only valid if the underlying data follows a Gaussian distribution. Gaussian distributions assume symmetry about the mean, which would imply the possibility of negative Γ analysis failing rates. This study demonstrates that the gamma distribution is a more reasonable assumption for establishing CL s than the Gaussian distribution used in TG ‐119. Thus, the gamma distribution is suggested as a replacement to the conventional Gaussian statistical model used in TG ‐119. Materials and methods The moments estimator ( ME ) for the gamma family is used to obtain the CL s of the failing rates for all Γ analysis criteria. To demonstrate the congruence of the gamma distribution, the root mean squared error and the CL values for the ME s of the gamma and the Gaussian families were compared. Results In this study, the empirical 95% CL s generated using 302 plans represent the ground truth, which resulted in a 91.83% passing rate using 3%/3 mm error local criteria. The gamma distribution underestimates the 95% CL by 0.09%, while the Gaussian distribution overestimates the 95% CL by 4.12%. Conclusions Although IMRT QA equipment may vary between clinics, the mathematical formalism presented in this study applies to any combination of planning and delivery systems. This study has demonstrated that a gamma distribution should be favored over a Gaussian distribution when establishing CL s for IMRT QA .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom