Premium
Surface applicator of a miniature X‐ray tube for superficial electronic brachytherapy of skin cancer
Author(s) -
Kim Hyun Nam,
Lee Ju Hyuk,
Park Han Beom,
Kim Hyun Jin,
Cho Sung Oh
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.12656
Subject(s) - materials science , flatness (cosmology) , electromagnetic shielding , brachytherapy , x ray tube , dosimetry , optics , monte carlo method , attenuation , flattening , graphite , nuclear medicine , radiation therapy , physics , composite material , electrode , quantum mechanics , medicine , anode , statistics , mathematics , cosmology
Purpose We designed and fabricated a surface applicator of a novel carbon nanotube ( CNT )‐based miniature X‐ray tube for the use in superficial electronic brachytherapy of skin cancer. To investigate the effectiveness of the surface applicator, the performance of the applicator was numerically and experimentally analyzed. Methods The surface applicator consists of a graphite flattening filter and an X‐ray shield. A Monte Carlo radiation transport code, MCNP 6, was used to optimize the geometries of both the flattening filter and the shield so that X‐rays are generated uniformly over the desired region. The performance of the graphite filter was compared with that of conventional aluminum (Al) filters of different geometries using the numerical simulations. After fabricating a surface applicator, the X‐ray spatial distribution was measured to evaluate the performance of the applicator. Results The graphite filter shows better spatial dose uniformity and less dose distortion than Al filters. Moreover, graphite allows easy fabrication of the flattening filter due to its low X‐ray attenuation property, which is particularly important for low‐energy electronic brachytherapy. The applicator also shows that no further X‐ray shielding is required for the application because unwanted X‐rays are completely protected. As a result, highly uniform X‐ray dose distribution was achieved from the miniature X‐ray tube mounted with the surface applicators. The measured values of both flatness and symmetry were less than 5% and the measured penumbra values were less than 1 mm. All these values satisfy the currently accepted tolerance criteria for radiation therapy. Conclusions The surface applicator exhibits sufficient performance capability for their application in electronic brachytherapy of skin cancers.