Premium
Data‐driven optimal binning for respiratory motion management in PET
Author(s) -
Kesner Adam L.,
Meier Joseph G.,
Burckhardt Darrell D.,
Schwartz Jazmin,
Lynch David A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1002/mp.12651
Subject(s) - bin , computer science , population , computer vision , artificial intelligence , noise (video) , window (computing) , algorithm , pattern recognition (psychology) , mathematics , image (mathematics) , demography , sociology , operating system
Purpose Respiratory gating has been used in PET imaging to reduce the amount of image blurring caused by patient motion. Optimal binning is an approach for using the motion‐characterized data by binning it into a single, easy to understand/use, optimal bin. To date, optimal binning protocols have utilized externally driven motion characterization strategies that have been tuned with population‐derived assumptions and parameters. In this work, we are proposing a new strategy with which to characterize motion directly from a patient's gated scan, and use that signal to create a patient/instance‐specific optimal bin image. Methods Two hundred and nineteen phase‐gated FDG PET scans, acquired using data‐driven gating as described previously, were used as the input for this study. For each scan, a phase‐amplitude motion characterization was generated and normalized using principle component analysis. A patient‐specific “optimal bin” window was derived using this characterization, via methods that mirror traditional optimal window binning strategies. The resulting optimal bin images were validated by correlating quantitative and qualitative measurements in the population of PET scans. Results In 53% (n = 115) of the image population, the optimal bin was determined to include 100% of the image statistics. In the remaining images, the optimal binning windows averaged 60% of the statistics and ranged between 20% and 90%. Tuning the algorithm, through a single acceptance window parameter, allowed for adjustments of the algorithm's performance in the population toward conservation of motion or reduced noise—enabling users to incorporate their definition of optimal. In the population of images that were deemed appropriate for segregation, average lesion SUV max were 7.9, 8.5, and 9.0 for nongated images, optimal bin, and gated images, respectively. The Pearson correlation of FWHM measurements between optimal bin images and gated images were better than with nongated images, 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. Generally, optimal bin images had better resolution than the nongated images and better noise characteristics than the gated images. Discussion We extended the concept of optimal binning to a data‐driven form, updating a traditionally one‐size‐fits‐all approach to a conformal one that supports adaptive imaging. This automated strategy was implemented easily within a large population and encapsulated motion information in an easy to use 3D image. Its simplicity and practicality may make this, or similar approaches ideal for use in clinical settings.