Performance comparison between a surface‐volume hybrid integrated mixer and a surface integrated mixer | Zendy

Li Zhaolong | Zendy; Chen Rushan | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Performance comparison between a surface‐volume hybrid integrated mixer and a surface integrated mixer

Author(s) -

Li Zhaolong,

Chen Rushan

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

microwave and optical technology letters

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.304

H-Index - 76

eISSN - 1098-2760

pISSN - 0895-2477

DOI - 10.1002/mop.28253

Subject(s) - volume (thermodynamics) , surface (topology) , microwave , materials science , electronic engineering , computer science , engineering , physics , telecommunications , mathematics , geometry , quantum mechanics

Two mixers using a “surface‐volume” hybrid integration approach and a “surface” integration approach are designed and fabricated. Their performances are compared with different measurement methods. Experiment results show that this so‐called surface‐volume hybrid integration approach demonstrates advantages when compared with a monotonous integration approach under certain circumstances. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 56:1015–1019, 2014

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research