Premium
Well‐posedness and asymptotic analysis for a Penrose–Fife type phase field system
Author(s) -
Rossi Riccarda
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
mathematical methods in the applied sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1099-1476
pISSN - 0170-4214
DOI - 10.1002/mma.510
Subject(s) - mathematics , type (biology) , field (mathematics) , phase (matter) , mathematical analysis , pure mathematics , physics , geology , quantum mechanics , paleontology
In this paper, an asymptotic analysis of the (non‐conserved) Penrose–Fife phase field system for two vanishing time relaxation parameters ε and δ is developed, in analogy with the similar analyses for the phase field model proposed by G. Caginalp ( Arch. Rational Mech. Anal . 1986; 92 :205–245), which were carried out by Rossi and Stoth ( Adv. Math. Sci. Appl . 2003; 13 :249–271; Quart. Appl. Math . 1995; 53 :695–700). Although formally the singular limits for ε ↓ 0 and for ε and δ ↓ 0 are, respectively, the viscous Cahn–Hilliard equation and the Cahn–Hilliard equation, it turns out that the Penrose–Fife system is indeed a bad approximation for these equations. Therefore, we consider an alternative approximating phase field system, which could be viewed as a generalization of the classical Penrose–Fife phase field system, featuring a double non‐linearity given by two maximal monotone graphs. A well‐posedness result is proved for such a system, and it is shown that the solutions converge to the unique solution of the viscous Cahn–Hilliard equation as ε ↓ 0, and of the Cahn–Hilliard equation as ε ↓ 0 and δ ↓ 0. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.