z-logo
Premium
Existence and limit behavior of prescribed L 2 ‐norm solutions for Schrödinger‐Poisson‐Slater systems in R 3
Author(s) -
Li Shuai,
Zhang Qi,
Zhu Xincai
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
mathematical methods in the applied sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1099-1476
pISSN - 0170-4214
DOI - 10.1002/mma.4556
Subject(s) - mathematics , limit (mathematics) , poisson distribution , norm (philosophy) , schrödinger's cat , mathematical physics , constraint (computer aided design) , combinatorics , mathematical analysis , geometry , statistics , political science , law
In this paper, we study constraint minimizers of the following L 2 −critical minimization problem:e ( N ) : = inf { E ( u ) , u ∈ H 1 ( R 3 )and∫ R 3| u | 2 d x = N > 0 } , where E ( u ) is the Schrödinger‐Poisson‐Slater functionalE ( u ) : = ∫ R 3| ∇ u | 2 d x − 1 2 ∫ R 3∫ R 3u 2 ( y ) u 2 ( x ) | x − y | d y d x − 3 5 ∫ R 3m ( x ) | u | 10 3d x , and N denotes the mass of the particles in the Schrödinger‐Poisson‐Slater system. We prove that e ( N ) admits minimizers for N < N ∗ : = ‖ Q ‖ 2 2and, however, no minimizers for N > N ∗ , where Q ( x ) is the unique positive solution of △ u − u + u 7 3= 0 in R 3 . Some results on the existence and nonexistence of minimizers for e ( N ∗ ) are also established. Further, when e ( N ∗ ) does not admit minimizers, the limit behavior of minimizers as N ↗ N ∗ is also analyzed rigorously.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom