z-logo
Premium
On the principles of limiting absorption and limit amplitude for a class of locally perturbed waveguides. Part 1: Time‐independent theory
Author(s) -
Morgenröther K.,
Werner P.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
mathematical methods in the applied sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1099-1476
pISSN - 0170-4214
DOI - 10.1002/mma.1670100203
Subject(s) - mathematics , limiting , amplitude , mathematical analysis , limit (mathematics) , complement (music) , perturbation (astronomy) , dirichlet distribution , standing wave , absorption (acoustics) , perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) , mathematical physics , quantum mechanics , physics , boundary value problem , optics , mechanical engineering , biochemistry , chemistry , complementation , engineering , gene , phenotype
Let Ω be a local perturbation of the n ‐dimensional domain Ω 0 = Ropf; n − 1 × (0, π). In a previous paper 8 we have introduced the notion of an admissible standing wave. We shall prove that the principle of limiting absorption holds for the Dirichlet problem of the reduced wave equation in Ω at ω ≥ 0 if Ω does not allow admissible standing waves with frequency ω. From Reference 8, this condition is satisfied for every ω ≥ 0 if Ω ≠ Ω 0 , and v · x ′ ≤ 0 on δΩ, where x ′ = ( x 1 ,…, x n − 1 , 0) and v is the normal unit vector on δΩ pointing into the complement of Ω. In contrast to this, the principle of limiting absorption is violated in the case of the unperturbed domain Ω 0 at the frequencies ω = 1,2,… if n ≤ 3. The second part of our investigation, which will appear in a subsequent paper, is devoted to the principle of limit amplitude.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom