Premium
Effectiveness of CASE Ultra Expert System in Evaluating Adverse Effects of Drugs
Author(s) -
Saiakhov Roustem,
Chakravarti Suman,
Klopman Gilles
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
molecular informatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.481
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1868-1751
pISSN - 1868-1743
DOI - 10.1002/minf.201200081
Subject(s) - cardiotoxicity , toxicity , reproductive toxicity , medicine , adverse effect , pharmacology , toxicology , bioinformatics , biology
Purpose of this pilot study is to test the QSAR expert system CASE Ultra for adverse effect prediction of drugs. 870 drugs from the SIDER adverse effect dataset were tested using CASE Ultra for carcinogenicity, genetic, liver, cardiac, renal and reproductive toxicity. 47 drugs that were withdrawn from market since the 1950s were also evaluated for potential risks using CASE Ultra and compared them with the actual reasons for which the drugs were recalled. For the whole SIDER test set ( n =870), sensitivity and specificity of the carcinogenicity predictions are 66.67 % and 82.17 % respectively; for liver toxicity: 78.95 %, 78.50 %; cardiotoxicity: 69.07 %, 57.57 %; renal toxicity: 46.88 %, 67.90 %; and reproductive toxicity: 100.00 %, 61.10 %. For the SIDER test chemicals not present in the training sets of the models, sensitivity and specificity of carcinogenicity predictions are 100.00 % and 88.89 % respectively ( n =404); for liver toxicity: 100.00 %, 51.33 % ( n =115); cardiotoxicity: 100.00 %, 20.45 % ( n =94); renal toxicity: 100.00 %, 45.54 % ( n =115); and reproductive toxicity: 100.00 %, 48.57 % ( n =246). CASE Ultra correctly recognized the relevant toxic effects in 43 out of the 47 withdrawn drugs. It predicted all 9 drugs that were not part of the training set of the models, as unsafe.