Premium
Shaping the breast in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction: Single‐ vs. two‐esthetic unit reconstruction
Author(s) -
Gravvanis Andreas,
Smith Roger W.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
microsurgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.031
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1098-2752
pISSN - 0738-1085
DOI - 10.1002/micr.20792
Subject(s) - medicine , breast reconstruction , inframammary fold , microsurgery , visual analogue scale , patient satisfaction , surgery , presentation (obstetrics) , breast cancer , implant , cancer
The esthetic outcome is dictated essentially not only by the position, size, and shape of the reconstructed breast, but also by the extra scaring involved. In the present study, we conducted a visual analog scale survey to compare the esthetic outcome in delayed autologous breast reconstruction following two different abdominal flaps inset. Twenty‐five patients had their reconstruction using the Single‐esthetic Unit principle and were compared with 25 patients that their breast was reconstructed using the Two‐Esthetic Unit principle. Photographic images were formulated to a PowerPoint presentation and cosmetic outcomes were assessed from 30 physicians, by means of a Questionnaire and a visual analog scale. Our data showed that the single‐esthetic unit breast reconstruction presents significant advantages over the traditional two‐esthetic units, due to inconspicuous flap reconstruction, better position of the inframammary fold, and more natural transition from native and reconstructed tissues. Moreover, patient self‐evaluation of esthetic outcome and quality of life showed that single‐esthetic unit reconstruction is associated with higher patient satisfaction, therefore should be considered the method of choice. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 30:509–516, 2010.