Premium
End‐to‐side neurorrhaphy: An experimental study in rabbits
Author(s) -
Jaberi Fereidoon Mojtahed,
Abbas Babak Pour,
Nezhad Simin Torabi,
Tanideh Nader
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
microsurgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.031
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1098-2752
pISSN - 0738-1085
DOI - 10.1002/micr.10142
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery
The concept of end‐to‐side nerve repair was recently introduced; however, most authors have reported conflicting results with this technique. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of end‐to‐side nerve repair in both fresh and predegenerated specimens by histological evaluation in an animal study in rabbits. Thirty male rabbits were divided into three groups. In group 1 (n = 14), the peroneal nerve was divided and sutured end‐to‐side to the tibial nerve via an epineurial window. In group 2 (n = 13), the peroneal nerve was divided and sutured end‐to‐side to the tibial nerve after a 1‐week “predegeneration period.” In group 3 (n = 3), which was considered the control group, the peroneal nerve was divided and sutured to the adjacent soft tissues. After 3 months, specimens were harvested for histological evaluation. Nerve fiber count, in normal peroneal nerves, averaged 532/cross section. In groups 1 and 2, average nerve fiber count in implanted peroneal nerves was 6.24 and 7.00/cross section, respectively. No significant statistical difference was observed between fresh and “predegenerated” groups ( P = 0.90). These data suggest that collateral sprouting of donor nerves is possible after end‐to‐side neurorrhaphy through an epineurial window, but the number of nerve fibers in recipient nerves is too low to result in any functional recovery in the target organ. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. MICROSURGERY 23:359–362 2003