Open AccessResearch participants’ experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web‐based alternatives
Author(s) -
Gaieski Jill B.,
PatrickMiller Linda,
Egleston Brian L.,
Maxwell Kara N.,
Walser Sarah,
DiGiovanni Laura,
Brower Jamie,
Fetzer Dominique,
Ganzak Amanda,
McKenna Danielle,
Long Jessica M.,
Powers Jacquelyn,
Stopfer Jill E.,
Nathanson Katherine L.,
Domchek Susan M.,
Bradbury Angela R.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
molecular genetics and genomic medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.765
H-Index - 29
ISSN - 2324-9269
DOI - 10.1002/mgg3.898
Subject(s) - genetic counseling , genetic testing , psychology , medicine , session (web analytics) , family medicine , clinical psychology , applied psychology , computer science , world wide web , genetics , biology
Abstract Background While there is increasing interest in sharing genetic research results with participants, how best to communicate the risks, benefits and limitations of research results remains unclear. Methods Participants who received genetic research results answered open and closed‐ended questions about their experiences receiving results and interest in and advantages and disadvantages of a web‐based alternative to genetic counseling. Results 107 BRCA1/2 negative women with a personal or family history of breast cancer consented to receive genetic research results and 82% completed survey items about their experience. Most participants reported there was nothing they disliked (74%) or would change (85%) about their predisclosure or disclosure session (78% and 89%). They most frequently reported liking the genetic counselor and learning new information. Only 24% and 26% would not be willing to complete predisclosure counseling or disclosure of results by a web‐based alternative, respectively. The most frequently reported advantages included convenience and reduced time. Disadvantages included not being able to ask questions, the risk of misunderstanding and the impersonal nature of the encounter. Conclusion Most participants receiving genetic research results report high satisfaction with telephone genetic counseling, but some may be willing to consider self‐directed web alternatives for both predisclosure genetic education and return of results.