
Identification of two compound heterozygous VPS13A large deletions in chorea‐acanthocytosis only by protein and quantitative DNA analysis
Author(s) -
Spieler Derek,
VelayosBaeza Antonio,
Mühlbäck Alžbeta,
Castrop Florian,
Maegerlein Christian,
SlottaHuspenina Julia,
Bader Benedikt,
Haslinger Bernhard,
Danek Adrian
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
molecular genetics and genomic medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.765
H-Index - 29
ISSN - 2324-9269
DOI - 10.1002/mgg3.1179
Subject(s) - sanger sequencing , genomic dna , exon , dna sequencing , genetics , compound heterozygosity , complementary dna , biology , dna , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , computational biology , mutation
Background Chorea‐acanthocytosis (ChAc; OMIM #200150) is a rare autosomal recessive condition with onset in early adulthood that is caused by mutations in the vacuolar protein sorting 13A ( VPS13A ) gene encoding chorein. Several diagnostic genomic DNA (gDNA) sequencing approaches are widely used. However, their limitations appear not to be acknowledged thoroughly enough. Methods Clinically, we deployed magnetic resonance imaging, blood smear analysis, and clinical chemistry for the index patient's characterization. The molecular analysis of the index patient next to his parents covered genomic DNA (gDNA) sequencing approaches, RNA/cDNA sequencing, and chorein specific Western blot. Results We report a 33‐year‐old male patient without functional protein due to compound heterozygosity for two VPS13A large deletions of 1168 and 1823 base pairs (bp) affecting, respectively, exons 8 and 9, and exon 13. To our knowledge, this represents the first ChAc case with two compound heterozygous large deletions identified so far. Of note, standard genomic DNA (gDNA) Sanger sequencing approaches alone yielded false negative findings. Conclusion Our case demonstrates the need to carry out detection of chorein in patients suspected of having ChAc as a helpful and potentially decisive tool to establish diagnosis. Furthermore, the course of the molecular analysis in this case discloses diagnostic pitfalls in detecting some variations, such as deletions, using only standard genomic DNA (gDNA) Sanger sequencing approaches and exemplifies alternative methods, such as RNA/cDNA sequencing or qRT‐PCR analysis, necessary to avoid false negative results.