Open AccessObserved and model‐simulated thermodynamic processes associated with urban heavy rainfall events over Bangalore, India
Author(s) -
Ajilesh P.,
Rakesh V.,
Sahoo Sanjeeb K.,
Himesh S.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
meteorological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1469-8080
pISSN - 1350-4827
DOI - 10.1002/met.1854
Subject(s) - convective available potential energy , weather research and forecasting model , environmental science , dew point , climatology , rain gauge , meteorology , monsoon , convection , atmospheric sciences , mathematics , precipitation , geology , geography
A total of 32 rainfall events spanning the period from 2012 to 2014 over the urban Indian city of Bangalore were simulated using the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model. Model simulations were carried out with a four‐nested domain initialized with Global Forecast System (GFS) data and the forecast was generated on an hourly basis. The forecasted rainfall at hobli level (Bangalore has 34 hobli divisions with an area of each hobli of the order of about 10 km 2 ) was evaluated in terms of its intensity and pattern of spatial distribution by comparing it with corresponding rain‐gauge observations. Also, the rainfall forecast skill of the model was evaluated statistically by computing root mean square error, bias and mean absolute error. Thermodynamic variables such as equivalent potential temperature, convective available potential energy (CAPE), convective inhibition (CIN), K index (KI), lifted index (LI) and total totals index (TTI) were also derived from the simulated model parameters for all the events and then verified against corresponding observations. The results showed that the WRF model could simulate the rainfall events and associated thermodynamic features qualitatively; however, there were few hobli s where the relative errors in the forecast were > 100%. The forecast errors were relatively lower for cases during the southwest monsoon season compared with other seasons. It was found that the model underestimated thermodynamic indices such as CAPE, dew point depression and the simulated LI were positive; these were indicative of the model's limitation in simulating intense convection and a possible reason for underpredicted rainfall simulations.