z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Verification and bias correction of ECMWF forecasts for I rish weather stations to evaluate their potential usefulness in grass growth modelling
Author(s) -
McDonnell Jack,
Lambkin Keith,
Fealy Rowan,
Hennessy Deirdre,
Shalloo Laurence,
Brophy Caroline
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
meteorological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1469-8080
pISSN - 1350-4827
DOI - 10.1002/met.1691
Subject(s) - environmental science , lead time , model output statistics , productivity , meteorology , climatology , agriculture , numerical weather prediction , econometrics , mathematics , economics , biology , ecology , geology , operations management , macroeconomics , physics
ABSTRACT Typical weather in I reland provides conditions favourable for sustaining grass growth throughout most of the year. This affords grass based farming a significant economic advantage due to the low input costs associated with grass production. To optimize the productivity of grass based systems, farmers must manage the resource over short time scales. While research has been conducted into developing predictive grass growth models for I reland to support on‐farm decision making, short term weather forecasts have not yet been incorporated into these models. To assess their potential for use in predictive grass growth models, deterministic forecasts from the E uropean C entre for M edium‐ R ange W eather F orecasts ( ECMWF ) were verified for lead times up to 10 days using observations from 25 I rish weather stations. Forecasts of air temperature variables were generally precise at all lead times, particularly up to 7 days. Verification of ECMWF soil temperature forecasts is limited, but here they were shown to be accurate at all depths and most precise at greater depths such as 50 cm. Rainfall forecasts performed well up to approximately 5 days. Seven bias correction techniques were assessed to minimize systematic biases in the forecasts. Based on the root mean squared error values, no large improvement was identified for rainfall forecasts on equivalent ECMWF forecasts, but the optimum bias corrections improved air and soil temperature forecasts greatly. Overall, the results demonstrated that forecasts predict observations accurately up to approximately a week in advance and therefore could prove valuable in grass growth prediction at farm level in I reland.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here