Open AccessAn evaluation of the WRF M ei‐yu rainfall forecasts in T aiwan, 2008–2010: differences in elevation and sub‐regions
Author(s) -
Paul Sahana,
Wang ChungChieh,
Chien FangChing,
Lee DongIn
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
meteorological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1469-8080
pISSN - 1350-4827
DOI - 10.1002/met.1689
Subject(s) - weather research and forecasting model , precipitation , climatology , elevation (ballistics) , environmental science , diurnal cycle , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , geology , geography , mathematics , geometry
This study explores differences in the performance of the M ei‐yu quantitative precipitation forecast ( QPF ) in T aiwan by use of the W eather R esearch and F orecasting ( WRF ) model in continuation of an earlier study, with particular detailed focus on those among three elevation ranges and four sub‐regions at different stages of the season and within the diurnal cycle. Against data from about 400 rain gauges, both subjective and objective verifications are performed to complement each other. The M ei‐yu QPF's skill is shown to vary with evaluation periods (every half‐month) within the season, with elevation (categorized as plain (0–250 m), slope (0.25–1 km) and mountain (>1 km) areas), and also with sub‐region (northern, central, southern and eastern T aiwan). The diurnal cycle of rainfall produced by the model is strong over the mountains, but too weak over the plains. Overall, the model exhibits the highest skill in southern and central T aiwan, where more rain occurs due to forced uplift of the prevailing southwesterly flow over the windward slopes (mainly during the first half of J une). In general, the more rainfall there is, the better the model performs (with higher skill) during the M ei‐yu season.