Open AccessCatchment dynamics and social response during flash floods: the potential of radar rainfall monitoring for warning procedures
Author(s) -
Creutin Jean Dominique,
Borga Marco,
Lutoff Céline,
Scolobig Anna,
Ruin Isabelle,
CrétonCazanave L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
meteorological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1469-8080
pISSN - 1350-4827
DOI - 10.1002/met.128
Subject(s) - flash flood , anticipation (artificial intelligence) , flood myth , warning system , watershed , response time , scale (ratio) , population , drainage basin , event (particle physics) , environmental resource management , flood warning , computer science , environmental science , geography , cartography , demography , sociology , telecommunications , physics , computer graphics (images) , archaeology , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , machine learning
Abstract The objective of this paper is to examine how current techniques for flash‐flood monitoring and forecasting can meet the needs of the population at risk to evaluate the flood severity and anticipate its danger. To this end, the social response time for different social actions in the course of two well studied flash flood events which occurred in France and Italy is identified. The event management activities are broadly characterized into three types according to their main objective (information, organisation and protection). The activities are also classified into three other types according to the scale and nature of the human group involved (individuals, communities and institutions). The conclusions reached relate to (1) the characterisation of the social responses according to watershed scale and to the information available, and (2) to the appropriateness of the existing surveillance and forecasting tools to support the social responses. Results suggest that representing the dynamics of the social response with just one number representing the average time for warning a population is an oversimplification. It appears that the social response time exhibits a parallel with the hydrological response time, by diminishing in time with decreasing size of the relevant watershed. A second result is that the human groups have different capabilities of anticipation, apparently based on the nature of information they use. Comparing watershed response times and social response times shows clearly that at scales of less than 100 km 2 , a number of actions were taken with response times comparable to the catchment response time. The implications for adapting the warning processes to social scales (individual or organisational scales) are considerable. At small scales, and for the implied anticipation times, the reliable and high‐resolution description of the actual rainfall field becomes the major source of information for decision‐making processes such as deciding between evacuations or advising to stay home. This points to the need to improve the accuracy and quality control of real time radar rainfall data, especially for extreme flash flood‐generating storms. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society