z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Defining annotations: a visual (re)interpretation
Author(s) -
Ruvane Mary B.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
proceedings of the american society for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1550-8390
pISSN - 0044-7870
DOI - 10.1002/meet.14504301226
Subject(s) - annotation , metadata , geographer , variety (cybernetics) , synonym (taxonomy) , interpretation (philosophy) , computer science , point (geometry) , cultural heritage , digitization , settlement (finance) , data science , tying , world wide web , information retrieval , history , archaeology , geography , artificial intelligence , cartography , botany , geometry , mathematics , programming language , payment , computer vision , biology , genus , operating system
A variety of research has focused on annotations and methods for incorporating ‘them’ into digital formats. Absent from most is a clear definition of what is meant by the term ‘annotation’ and the characteristics they embody. In the digital world it is often perceived as a synonym for metadata, but in the analog world it may refer to a reader's scribbled notes in the margins. These are both types of annotation, but at opposing ends of the scale; one formal the other informal. Marshall's (1998b) seven dimensions of annotation are (re)presented here in a new visual format (figure 1) for comparison to an historical geographers information needs and note taking behavior. One of the geographer's objectives was to reconstruct a digital map of 18th century North Carolina settlement patterns. The findings point to an untapped avenue for improving access to our nations cultural heritage.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here