z-logo
Premium
Essential and aging‐related tremor: Differences of central control
Author(s) -
Muthuraman Muthuraman,
Deuschl Günther,
Anwar Abdul Rauf,
Mideksa Kidist Gebremariam,
von Helmolt Friederike,
Schneider Susanne A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
movement disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.352
H-Index - 198
eISSN - 1531-8257
pISSN - 0885-3185
DOI - 10.1002/mds.26410
Subject(s) - essential tremor , neuroscience , physical medicine and rehabilitation , medicine , psychology
Background For essential tremor, the distribution of age of onset is bimodally distributed, with peaks in adolescence and another in late adulthood. The latter is here referred to as aging‐related tremor, and it is considered to be associated with earlier aging and increased mortality. We hypothesize that different tremor networks detected by multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) underlie these two tremor groups. Methods We investigated 20 patients with essential tremor separated into two groups and 10 age‐ and sex‐matched aging‐related tremor patients using pooled coherence spectra of the maximally coherent EEG electrodes during a holding task, a pinch grip task, and whilst performing slow hand movements. Functional and effective connectivity at the coupling frequency was estimated. Results The maximal coherence was significantly higher in early‐onset essential tremor compared with aging‐related tremor during the three tasks. Compared with the patients with aging‐related tremor, 2 Hz to 40 Hz power, spectral peak frequency, and relative signal‐to‐noise ratio were not different, but the electromyographic amplitude was significantly greater in essential tremor. The source analysis revealed the well‐known cortico‐brainstem‐cerebello‐thalamo‐cortical network for classical essential tremor, but patients with aging‐related tremor showed a cortico‐thalamic network only. The connections between the sources for both tremors were bidirectional. Only the cerebellum and the brainstem showed unidirectional connections in essential tremor and the thalamus in aging‐related tremor patients. A second essential tremor group with similar electromyographic amplitudes confirmed the differences between both tremor types. Conclusion We show that the oscillating cerebral networks underlying classical essential tremor and aging‐related tremor differ, suggesting a pathophysiological difference. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here