Premium
Prerequisites to launch neuroprotective trials in Parkinson's disease: An industry perspective
Author(s) -
Streffer Johannes R.,
Grachev Igor D.,
FitzerAttas Cheryl,
GomezMancilla Baltazar,
Boroojerdi Babak,
Bronzova Juliana,
Ostrowitzki Susanne,
Victor Stephen J.,
Fontoura Paulo,
Alexander Robert
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
movement disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.352
H-Index - 198
eISSN - 1531-8257
pISSN - 0885-3185
DOI - 10.1002/mds.25017
Subject(s) - clinical trial , disease , parkinson's disease , standardization , population , medicine , clinical research , intensive care medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , movement disorders , psychology , neuroscience , physical therapy , pathology , political science , environmental health , law
Realizing that 60% to 80% of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons are nonfunctional at the time of clinical diagnosis, there is an emerging consensus that disease‐modifying treatments should be initiated in the earliest stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). To date, clinical trial designs and metrics in PD have been focused on motor symptoms as the core feature of the clinical disease. To identify earlier or “pre‐motor” populations in PD, new markers have been proposed. We address the prerequisites needed to use these pre‐motor markers in clinical trials for the selection of subjects, definition of populations, and monitoring of disease progression. This may require the development of new diagnostic criteria potentially based on non‐motor clinical signs, imaging techniques, or biological features, all requiring discussion in a regulatory framework. Questions addressed include: Which steps must be taken to gain a broad consensus in the field from academic opinion leaders, patient advocacy groups, regulatory bodies, and industry? How do we prevent the selection of subgroups, which may not be representative of the full disease spectrum? Is there a way forward in personalized medicine? How do we balance risk and benefit in an at‐risk population? While many tools are available, a concerted effort is required to develop integrated data sets, as well as to achieve the necessary standardization for multicenter clinical trials. To this end, public‐private consortia (including academic centers, patient advocacy groups, and industry) will be of crucial importance to prospectively investigate and define the best tools and treatment paradigms. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society