z-logo
Premium
Cut‐off score of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale for screening dementia in Parkinson's disease
Author(s) -
Llebaria Gisela,
Pagonabarraga Javier,
Kulisevsky Jaime,
GarcíaSánchez Carmen,
PascualSedano Berta,
Gironell Alexandre,
MartínezCorral Mercè
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
movement disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.352
H-Index - 198
eISSN - 1531-8257
pISSN - 0885-3185
DOI - 10.1002/mds.22173
Subject(s) - dementia , psychology , population , receiver operating characteristic , rating scale , medicine , psychiatry , disease , developmental psychology , environmental health
The prevalence of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD) is close to 30%, and its incidence is 4 to 6 times higher than in age‐matched general population. PD with dementia (PDD) is mainly characterized by a predominant and progressive frontal‐subcortical impairment. The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) is a commonly used screening test that sensitively measures the degree of frontal‐subcortical defects. Although the MDRS has been validated as a screening test of cognitive dysfunction in nondemented PD patients (PD‐ND), its utility for screening dementia in PD is unknown. In order to validate the MDRS for diagnosis of PDD it was prospectively administered to 92 PD patients (57 PD‐ND, 35 PDD) fulfilling UK‐PDSBB criteria. Dementia was diagnosed according to DSM‐IV‐TR and a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale score ≥1. Univariate, logistic regression, and ROC curve analysis were carried out to measure the discriminative power of MDRS in PDD. Regression analysis showed MDRS total scores to independently differentiate PD‐ND from PDD ( P < 0.001). Age and education did not predict the presence of dementia. ROC curve analysis showed a cut‐off score of ≤123 on the MDRS total scores to yield high sensitivity (92.65%), specificity (91.4%), positive and negative predictive values (PPV 83.3%, NPV 96.4%). A brief version of the MDRS obtained by the addition of the memory, initiation/perseveration, and conceptualization subscores yielded similar discriminant properties. The MDRS has an excellent discriminant ability to diagnose dementia in PD and provides an objective measure to distinguish PD‐ND from PDD. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here