Premium
Validation of the freezing of gait questionnaire in patients with Parkinson's disease
Author(s) -
Giladi Nir,
Tal Joseph,
Azulay Tali,
Rascol Oliver,
Brooks David J.,
Melamed Eldad,
Oertel Wolfgang,
Poewe Werner H.,
Stocchi Fabrizio,
Tolosa Eduardo
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
movement disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.352
H-Index - 198
eISSN - 1531-8257
pISSN - 0885-3185
DOI - 10.1002/mds.21745
Subject(s) - psychology , parkinson's disease , physical therapy , rating scale , gait , entacapone , placebo , beck depression inventory , reliability (semiconductor) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , medicine , levodopa , disease , psychiatry , anxiety , developmental psychology , power (physics) , physics , alternative medicine , pathology , quantum mechanics
To revalidate the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG‐Q), patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline (1 mg/day) (n = 150), entacapone (200 mg with each dose of levodopa) (n = 150), or placebo (n = 154). Patients were assessed at baseline and after 10 weeks using the FOG‐Q, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ‐39). FOG‐Q dimensionality, test–retest reliability, and internal reliability were examined. Convergent and divergent validities were assessed by correlating FOG‐Q with UPDRS, BDI, and PDQ‐39. Comparisons between FOG‐Q item 3 and UPDRS item 14 were also made. Principal component analysis indicated that FOG‐Q measures a single dimension. Test–retest reliability and internal reliability of FOG‐Q score was high. FOG‐Q was best correlated to items of the UPDRS relating to walking, general motor issues, and mobility. Correlations between baseline and endpoint suggested that FOG‐Q item 3 is at least as reliable as UPDRS item 14. At baseline, 85.9% of patients were identified as “Freezers” using FOG‐Q item 3 (≥1) and 44.1% using UPDRS item 14 (≥1) ( P < 0.001). FOG‐Q was a reliable tool for the assessment of treatment intervention. FOG‐Q item 3 was effective as a screening question for the presence of FOG. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society