z-logo
Premium
Takeover deterrents and cross partial ownership: The case of golden shares
Author(s) -
Serbera JeanPhilippe,
Fry John
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
managerial and decision economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.288
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1099-1468
pISSN - 0143-6570
DOI - 10.1002/mde.2998
Subject(s) - profitability index , collusion , cournot competition , incentive , business , relevance (law) , capital (architecture) , industrial organization , economics , monetary economics , microeconomics , finance , law , archaeology , political science , history
We analyse takeovers in an industry with bilateral capital‐linked firms in cross partial ownership (CPO). Before merger, CPO reduces the profitability of involved firms, confirming the “outsider effect.” However, the impact of CPO upon merger profitability is two‐sided in a Cournot setting. CPO, by cointegrating profits, increases output collusion leading to anticompetitive effects with facilitated mergers in most cases. Nonetheless, a protective threshold exists for which CPO arrangements can reduce the incentives for hostile takeovers. This has potentially significant regulatory implications. An illustrative example showcases the potential relevance of CPO as a defence against hostile takeovers across different industries.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here