z-logo
Premium
Quality competition and entry deterrence: When to launch a second brand
Author(s) -
Müller Stephan,
Götz Georg
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
managerial and decision economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.288
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1099-1468
pISSN - 0143-6570
DOI - 10.1002/mde.2858
Subject(s) - business , competition (biology) , deterrence theory , quality (philosophy) , barriers to entry , safeguarding , industrial organization , advertising , marketing , market structure , biology , medicine , ecology , philosophy , physics , nursing , epistemology , nuclear physics
We study the rationale for an incumbent to launch a second brand when facing potential entry into a market with quality‐differentiated products and a fringe producer. Depending on market size, the cost of a second brand and a potential entrant's setup cost the incumbent might use a second brand both when deterring and when accommodating entry. For low costs of brand proliferation, the high‐quality firm will prevent entry with limit qualities or multiple brands. The high‐quality incumbent will accommodate entry only if it cannot be prevented. Accommodation is always accompanied by an additional brand safeguarding the premium brand.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here