z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Clinical benefit of neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 utilization among different tumors
Author(s) -
Li Zhiyang,
Wu Xin,
Zhao Yanjie,
Xiao Yinan,
Zhao Yunuo,
Zhang Ting,
Li Hui,
Sha Fushen,
Wang Yating,
Deng Lei,
Ma Xuelei
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medcomm
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2688-2663
DOI - 10.1002/mco2.61
Subject(s) - medicine , adverse effect , oncology , neoadjuvant therapy , lung cancer , breast cancer , febrile neutropenia , neutropenia , complete response , pd l1 , cancer , chemotherapy , immunotherapy
PD‐1/PD‐L1 (programmed cell death‐1 and programmed death‐ligand 1) inhibitors utilization in neoadjuvant therapy has been assessed in tumors. This study focused on the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy. A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases to identify eligible studies. Major response rate (MRR) and complete response rate (CRR) were pooled in this analysis to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 utilization, all grades and high‐grade adverse events (AEs) were pooled to evaluate its safety. Twenty studies were included in this meta‐analysis, with 828 patients suffering from different tumors. The pooled CRR of triple‐negative breast cancer was 0.569 (95% CI 0.514, 0.624, I 2  = 0%) and the pooled MRR of lung cancer was 0.471 (95% CI 0.267, 0.575, I 2  = 0%). The most frequent adverse event was fatigue (0.272 95% CI 0.171, 0.402, I 2  = 87%), and the most common high‐grade adverse event was febrile neutropenia (0.084 95% CI 0.063, 0.112, I 2  = 85%). In conclusion, neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy received satisfactory clinical results in these tumors included.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here