z-logo
Premium
Influence of DNA repair by ada and ogt alkytransferases on the mutational specificity of alkylating agents
Author(s) -
RoldánArjona Teresa,
LuqueRomero Francisco L.,
Ariza Rafael R.,
Jurado Juan,
Pueyo Carmen
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
molecular carcinogenesis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.254
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1098-2744
pISSN - 0899-1987
DOI - 10.1002/mc.2940090404
Subject(s) - biology , dna , genetics , computational biology , microbiology and biotechnology
We investigated the influence of the alkyltransferases (ATases) encoded by the ada and ogt genes of Escherichia coli on the mutational specificity of alkylating agents. A new mutational assay for selection of supF ‐ mutations in shuttle‐vector plasmids was used. Treating plasmid‐bearing bacteria with N ‐methyl‐ N ‐nitrosourea (MNU), N ‐ethyl‐ N ‐nitrosourea (ENU), and ethyl methanesulfonates (EMS) dramatically increased the muttation frequency (from 33‐fold to 789‐fold). The vast majority of mutations (89–100%) were G:C←A:T transitions. This type of mutation increased in ada ‐ (MNU) or ogt ‐ (ENU) bacteria, suggesting that repair of O 6 ‐methylguanine by ada ATase and repair of O 6 ‐ethylguanine by ogt ATase contribute mainly to the decrease in G:C←A:T transitions. The analysis of neighboring base sequences revealed an overabundance of G:C←A:T transitions at 5′‐GG sequences. The 5′‐PuG bias increased in ATase‐defective cells, suggesting that these sequences were not refractory to repair. G:C←A:T transitions occurred preferentially in the untranscribed strand after in vivo exposure. That this strand specificity was detected even in bacteria devoid of ATase activity ( ada ‐ ogt ‐ ) and not after in vitro mutagenesis suggests a bias for damage induction rather than for DNA repair. Highly significant differences were found between the in vivo and in vitro incidences of G:C←A:T substitutions at the two major hotspots, positions 123 (5′‐GGG‐3′; antisense strand) and 168 (5′‐GGA‐3′; sense strand). These results are explained by differences in the probability of formation of stem‐loop structures in vivo and in vitro. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom