z-logo
Premium
Experimentelle Evaluation und Abschätzung der Formgebungsgrenzen von rührreibgeschweißten Blechen aus AA 6061 T6 mit unterschiedlicher Schweißrichtung und Schweißposition
Author(s) -
Ramulu P. J.,
Narayanan R. G.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
materialwissenschaft und werkstofftechnik
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.285
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1521-4052
pISSN - 0933-5137
DOI - 10.1002/mawe.201300078
Subject(s) - welding , necking , materials science , friction stir welding , limit load , limit (mathematics) , composite material , structural engineering , finite element method , mathematics , engineering , mathematical analysis
Abstract The main objective of the present work is to predict the forming limit of friction stir welded (FSW) sheets made of AA 6061T6, having different weld orientations, weld locations, and made at two different welding speeds. The predicted forming limit curves (FLCs) are validated with experimental FLCs. The thickness gradient based necking criterion (TGNC) and major strain‐rate ratio based necking criterion (MSRC) are used to predict the forming limit. The significance of single zone model and double zone model in FLC prediction is discussed. A decrease in hardness is witnessed in the weld zone as compared to base material. With increase in shoulder diameter and decrease in rotational speed, hardness has improved in the weld zone. The forming limit predictions of un‐welded sheets and FSW sheets coincide well with experimental results. The predicted FLCs of FSW sheets from TGNC and MSRC are equally accurate as compared to experimental FLCs in all the weld locations. Both TGNC and MSRC predict almost the same forming limit in 90° weld orientation, while TGNC showed better prediction in 45° weld orientation. FSW sheets with double zone models show better prediction accuracy than single zone models in most of the cases, except in the case of weld at centre location and at longitudinal orientation. There is only slight deviation between single zone and double zone model predictions. The failure location and failure pattern predictions are also agreeing well with the experimental FLCs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here