Premium
The Effect of Chain Architecture on the Dynamics of Copolymers in a Homopolymer Matrix: Lattice Monte Carlo Simulations using the Bond‐Fluctuation Model
Author(s) -
Kamath Sudesh Y.,
Dadmun Mark D.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
macromolecular theory and simulations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1521-3919
pISSN - 1022-1344
DOI - 10.1002/mats.200500023
Subject(s) - copolymer , materials science , monte carlo method , molecular dynamics , polymer , polymer chemistry , chemical physics , sequence (biology) , statistical physics , chemistry , computational chemistry , physics , composite material , mathematics , biochemistry , statistics
Summary: The effects of copolymer sequence distribution on the dynamics of a copolymer in a homopolymer matrix are studied using computer simulations within the framework of the bond‐fluctuation model on blends containing low concentrations (10%) of copolymers dispersed in a homopolymer matrix. The sequence distribution of the two copolymer components was changed while maintaining the overall copolymer composition at 50/50. Our results indicate that copolymers with disordered sequence distributions exhibit dynamics that are faster than that of a homopolymer melt, while those with ordered sequence distributions exhibit a tendency to form aggregates that lead to slower dynamics as well as phase separation. Analysis of the structure suggests that copolymers with an alternating sequence distribution form large aggregates that are short‐lived, while diblocks form permanent micelle‐like structures. Analysis of the local composition around a copolymer molecule indicates that aggregation between copolymer chains has a direct impact on the local composition. This in turn has a significant impact on system dynamics. Our results indicate that the dynamics of random, random‐blocky, and alternating copolymers are nearly identical and are faster than that of a homopolymer melt. However, alternating copolymers form aggregates and hence are not uniformly distributed throughout the matrix phase. Thus, alternating copolymers are at a disadvantage in their ability to be effective compatibilizers. From a dynamic perspective, copolymers with random and random‐blocky copolymers seem to be ideal compatibilizers since they are distributed uniformly throughout the system and move rapidly through the matrix phase.Snapshots of aggregates of alternating copolymer chains. Dark and bright spheres represent A and B monomers, respectively.