Premium
Fractionation of Polypropylene Impact Copolymers Using Temperature Rising Elution Fractionation (TREF)
Author(s) -
Mncwabe Sebenzile,
Luruli Nyambeni,
Marantos Evangelia,
Nhlapo Piet,
Botha Linda
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
macromolecular symposia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.257
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1521-3900
pISSN - 1022-1360
DOI - 10.1002/masy.201250304
Subject(s) - copolymer , fractionation , polypropylene , materials science , elution , dynamic mechanical analysis , polymer , fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , chemical engineering , ethylene , ethylene propylene rubber , microstructure , polymer chemistry , composite material , chromatography , chemistry , organic chemistry , catalysis , engineering
Impact polypropylene copolymers (ICPs) have complex microstructures compared to homo‐ or random copolymers of propylene. Standard analytical techniques are unable to unpack the complex structure of impact copolymers, hence the need to fractionate the material. The investigation of poly(propylene‐ethylene) block copolymers was conducted in order to understand the copolymer composition and the role of particular components by fractionation. Temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF) was used for fractionation of ICPs which involves breaking up the polymer into small fractions that can be analysed further to give more understanding on the complex microstructures. Two ICP samples (ICP1 and ICP2) with different physical properties were fractionated. The bulk samples as well as the resulting fractions were further analysed using DSC, FTIR and DMA. Below 0 °C, the DMA results of the bulk sample with high ethylene content (ICP1) showed both low storage modulus and stiffness which is in line with expectations. However, it was interesting to note that above 0 °C the trend was reversed, thus ICP2 with low ethylene content had lower storage modulus and stiffness. The DSC and FTIR results of the fractions of the two samples revealed different or inhomogeneous distribution of ethylene content between the samples which explained differences in mechanical properties. The findings emphasize the contributions of phase separation and compatibility between the rubber and the matrix towards physical and mechanical properties.