Premium
Processing and Properties of Nanocomposite Filament Yarns with Various Filler Concentrations from Two Different Modification Methods
Author(s) -
Dastjerdi Roya,
Mojtahedi M. R. M.,
Shoshtari A. M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
macromolecular symposia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.257
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1521-3900
pISSN - 1022-1360
DOI - 10.1002/masy.200851421
Subject(s) - masterbatch , materials science , crystallinity , spinning , composite material , plastics extrusion , polypropylene , nanocomposite , tenacity (mineralogy) , melt spinning
In this research, the possibility of producing and processing nanocomposite polypropylene filament yarns with permanent antimicrobial efficiency has been assessed by comparing two different methods. Therefore two approaches were used to mix various blending contents of antimicrobial agents based on silver/TiO 2 nano particles with PP: 1) mixing of PP powder and inorganic nanocomposite powder as an antibacterial agent with the appropriate concentration in a twin screw extruder, preparing modified granules and feeding them to the melt spinning machine, 2) producing masterbatch by a twin screw extruder and blending it with PP in the melt spinning process. In both methods, pure PP and all other combined samples had an acceptable spinnability at the spinning temperature of 240 °C and take‐up speed of 2000 m/min. After producing as‐spun filament yarns by a pilot plant melt spinning machine, samples were drawn, textured and finally weft knitted. Physical and structural properties of as‐spun and drawn yarns with constant and variable draw ratios were investigated and compared. Moreover, the DSC, SEM and FTIR techniques have been used for samples characterization. Finally antibacterial efficiency of knitted samples was evaluated. The experimental results indicated that the maximum crystallinity reduction of modified as‐spun yarns reached 5%. But by applying method 2 (masterbatch), crystallinity of modified as‐spun yarns remained unchanged compared to pure yarn. However, drawing procedure has compensated this difference. By applying the second method, the drawing generally improved the increase of tenacity and modulus of modified fibers, whereas in method 1 the opposite effect was noticed in the case of constant draw ratio. Although the biostatic efficiency of nanocomposite fibers was excellent in both methods, modified fabrics obtained from method 1 showed higher bioactivity.