Premium
Model Development in Thermal Styrene Polymerization
Author(s) -
Matthews Bryan,
Villa Carlos,
Pierini Pete
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
macromolecular symposia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.257
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1521-3900
pISSN - 1022-1360
DOI - 10.1002/masy.200751311
Subject(s) - polymerization , ethylbenzene , polystyrene , styrene , thermodynamics , materials science , standard deviation , mathematics , polymer chemistry , work (physics) , monomer , polymer , chemistry , copolymer , statistics , physics , organic chemistry , composite material , catalysis
Summary: The thermal polymerization of styrene is usually modeled by relying on a reaction scheme and a set of equations that were developed more than three decades ago by Hui and Hamielec. Many detailed models of styrene polymerization are available in the open literature and they are mostly based on the work of Hui and Hamielec, which nearly makes this the standard to follow in explaining the behavior of polystyrene reactors. The model of Hui and Hamielec does a very nice job of describing monomer conversion data but discrepancies are seen between observed and predicted values of number and weight average molecular weights, M n and M w . Discrepancies in number average molecular weight seem to be the result of random noise. Discrepancies in weight average molecular weight grow as the polymerization temperature decreases and some of the trends observed in the residuals over the entire temperature range cannot be attributed to random noise. Hui and Hamielec attributed the observed deficiencies to a standard deviation of ±10% in their GPC measurements. A new data set with an experimental error of 2% for average molecular weights is presented. The set contains measured values of M n , M w and M z , so the polymerization scheme has been extended to include third order moments. The data set also includes the effect of ethylbenzene as a chain transfer agent. We present the results of comparing model predictions to our measurements and the adjustments made in the original set of kinetic parameters published by Hui and Hamielec.